Let me get this straight….

President Obama feels that the Egyptian protests in the streets of Egypt justify a change in government, and thus the government should heed to the voice of the people? That the government should not silence the voice of the mobs, and thus mob rule should reign?
I wonder how President Obama would feel if the shoe were on the other foot? Let’s say perhaps if we went to the streets to oppose the socialization of America? If we went to the streets to overturn the Obamacare socialized medicine scheme?
President Obama also has publicly renounced Egypt’s alleged violence against its citizens when the total death toll from the protests at last check was 38. Incidentally they were responding to violence. Did you hear President Obama tell that to the Chinese? Or perhaps did you hear President Obama tell that to Cuba? No, an odd coincidence is that those who are working to overturn the Egyptian government are Muslims. Also, I do not hear the outcry from the left that we are not to be the policeman of the world, nor that we should not try to control other sovereign nations, yet that is what President Obama is doing.
We are now seeing the fruits of the famed “apology” tour of President Obama. Iran now has nuclear capability which threatens Mid-East peace, and primarily the security of the people of Israel. Egypt, if indeed becomes Muslim governed through the Islamic Brotherhood, would then no longer be the safety check against rogue Islamic extremist countries.
But does any of that affect us?
Here is the long answer to a very short question. First off let me state that I am only giving political and national security repercussions, as morally it is quite obvious that we cannot allow the planned annihilation of Israel or any other people that do not succumb to Islam. Without Israel there is no safety check in the Middle East. If Egypt is lost to Muslim extremists, then there is a little something called the Suez Canal that may affect things. Not only do prices go up at the pump, and any item you buy that contains petroleum increase, but a major worldwide economic collapse would eventually occur. Not to mention that our own military relies on fuel. If that were not enough, with a worldwide economic collapse would come uprisings due to that collapse, which would topple governments, as well as order across the globe. The result would be total anarchy.
And what of the defense of our own country? For one, we would see uprisings as well. Enemies of America would be further emboldened, as we see Muslim extremists already crossing through the sieve known as our Southern Border. Sadly some have already forgotten 9/11 as well as the multiple past attacks against America. President Obama is undoing decades of work that was done to keep a volatile region from infecting the rest of the globe through his actions as well as inactions. It would seem that the “yes we can” slogan was adopted by the Muslim extremists due to President Obama’s leadership or lack of. More of the Hope and Change that we all feared is coming true. May God help America from its leader. Perhaps we should take to the streets before it is too late. After all, President Obama says he supports that. Or maybe he just believes that this applies to the other guys.

Those zany peace loving Muslims......

In Egypt the "Muslim Brotherhood" has called for protests in order to take over the Egyptian government. While this is basically anarchy,the Obama Administration is calling for the Egyptian Government to "show restraint" and allow the protests.

"Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called on the Egyptian government to exercise restraint in dealing with protests and to respect citizens' human rights. She also cautioned demonstrators to refrain from violence. Clinton asked the government "to allow peaceful protests and reverse the unprecedented steps it has taken to cut off communications."

Respect citizen human rights? You mean allow the protestors to continue rioting? "Cautioned protestors"? Excuse me Mrs. Clinton, but your comments to the government go to the government, and your comments to the protestors go nowhere. The de-stabilization of Egypt is one of the biggest threats to Middle East peace, and our bungling apologizer Obama has shown the world that we are now too weak to respond. Thus, the Muslims feel that they have their chance and are taking it. I wonder how the Obama administration would react if it were happening here? They want to limit free speech with such things as the "Fairness Doctrine", and they dare criticize Egypt for quelling anarchy? Should Obama not back the current Egyptian government we may well be seeing the seeds of WWIII.
Now thats change we can believe in!

My View of the SOTU by Gayle Mahon

After having a day to digest the SOTU, I am surprised that more have not commented on the slap in our face by Obama referencing all of his glowing statements about China. It is unreal to me, that we have a President who, instead of talking about America's greatness, worships at the feet of a brutal, Communist dictatorship. I wonder what the children trapped in child labor in China or the people in Chinese prisons, whose only crime is to want freedom, would say if they could have heard Obama's speech? His praise of the Chinese educational system is unbelievable!! Children are forced to go to government controlled schools that brain wash them for 12 hours a day. Oh, wait a minute, part of that describes some of OUR public schools in this country. Women are forced to have abortions if they have more than one child - some are forceably sterilized. The comment he made, longingly, about if the Chinese government doesn't want a story in the media, it's not in the media, was a fruedian slip on his goal for our country. WAKE UP AMERICA! You can believe the Communist Chinese are laughing very loudly behind our backs. A great summary of the SOTU posted in the "IUSB Vision Weblog" follows:

Translation of Obama’s SOTU ‘Five’ Pillars Posted by iusbvisionon January 26, 2011 As a follow up to our live bloggingto President Obama’s State of the Union address a translation of the five pillars seems in order.
“Making sure we are competitive and creating jobs” sounds great, but we have heard that before. We have also heard it after every bill that turns out to be a power grab that fails the economy he says “OK now we will focus on jobs.”
So far he is doing a great job of shutting down energy production and sending “green jobs” funds to China.
Innovation:
Forbid drilling, closing more coal mines, forbid nuclear plant licencing, no new natural gas, more solar panel factories chased out of the country, more low cost loans to foreign countries so THEY can drill more, more Mexican, Cuban and Chinese oil wells just off our shores, more EPA caps on our refineries. More expensive energy.
The solution? The joke that is now called the Chevy Volt. Poisonous
and expensive twisty light bulbs, expensive solar and wind power that
can’t do the industrial heavy lifting we need.
Education:
More government programs and bureaucrats, more tax dollars thrown at teachers unions. More sabotaging of voucher programs. More outrageous reporting requirements. More failed schools. More students left behind.
Information:
More online databases of your information such as medical records. Privacy (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)?
Infrastructure:
Make work programs for unions in cities, like the high speed raid Obama mentioned. Corruption: Stimulus Funds Spent in Democrat Districts… Deficit Reduction:
Keep repeating the lie that ObamaCare lowers the deficit. Raise taxes.
Government Reform:
Rule by executive order. Bypass Congress and put the czar’s to work. Abuse the regulatory and permit process for social engineering

WOW! He says it like it is!

Are Libs throwing Obama under the bus?

Obama's lust for power and re-election even has some prominent "progressives" upset....

CNN Article

(CNN) – "Freshly reelected to another six-year term, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid isn’t holding back fire when it comes to his disagreements with President Obama over a ban on earmarks.

“This is an applause line,” the Nevada Democrat told NBC News Wednesday regarding Obama’s pledge not to sign a bill with earmark spending in it. “It’s an effort by the White House to get more power. They have enough power as it is.”
.............. "Added a visibly frustrated Reid, "I have a constitutional obligation to do congressionally-directed spending. I know much more what's needed in Elko, Nevada . . . than some bureaucrat does back here."
Reid, himself a former boxer who has always been quick with fighting words, added the president needs to “back off” this argument.
“The American public should understand, and I am sure they will as time goes by, that the president has enough power. He should just back off. He’s get enough to do without messing in what we do.”

I love cat fights. Especially when its the progressives unravelling.

Sneak Preview - Yes They Can, and Will

Based on the class envy that the left is feeding their followers, the story below may be a sneak preview for whats to come in America.

Read entire Guardian U.K. Article

Chávez tackles housing crisis by urging poor to squat wealthy parts of Caracas

Move to exploit 'unused' land in capital rattles Venezuela's middle class, as troops also take over 'unproductive' farms

Venezuelans left homeless after December's torrential rains gather in the wealthy Caracas neighbourhood of La Castellana. Photograph: Carlos Garcia Rawlins/Reuters

Hugo Chávez has sent out troops to take over farms and urged the poor to occupy "unused" land in wealthy areas of Caracas, prompting a wave of squats that is rattling Venezuela's middle class.

The move by Venezuela's president to step up the campaign to "recover" land and other property follows a housing crisis that has left millions of people in shabby conditions and affected his popularity in the run-up to next year's election.
Squatters wearing red T-shirts from Chávez's socialist party seized 20 spaces in a co-ordinated strike in the well-off Caracas municipality of Chacao last weekend, a move which shocked even some government supporters. Additional groups have targeted other cities.
......"The fundamental goal of socialism is to satisfy human needs … the needs of all, equally, without privilege," Chávez said in a television broadcast yesterday.
Opponents claim the government has failed to build enough houses over the past decade and has been offering "empty promises". Previous house-building deals with foreign allies reportedly produced just 10% of the promised number.
Emilio Grateron, mayor of Chacao, described Chávez's exhortation to seize supposedly unoccupied land as demagogic, and a move that would kill what little private investment remained. "There is irresponsible rhetoric without heed of the consequences. This is a very dangerous game."
The government has stepped up rural expropriations by deploying 1,600 troops at 47 farms in the western states of Merida and Zulia, claiming the farms were unproductive. The state has taken control of 2.5m hectares since Chávez gained power in 1999.
........Under Chávez the government has built fewer than 40,000 units a year – some say only 24,000 – in contrast to previous governments, which averaged 70,000. The president admits to problems but rejects accusations of incompetence and corruption. He has said that the rich keep all the best land, especially in the capital, but often leave it idle. The government has closed six golf courses and recently had its eye on the Caracas Country Club, saying thousands of poor families could be settled on its greens.
........"the middle-class cannot be an enemy of this democratic revolution". However, the government made clear the squatting would continue, saying the correct term was "occupation".
Even hotels have become skittish since being asked to host those displaced by the floods. They have obliged, but some proprietors now worry they will be the next industry to be nationalised.
Chacao's five-star Marriott hotel is hosting about 60 displaced families on its third and fourth floors. It has replaced doors with curtains and removed TVs, lamps and other fittings, but Maria Patino, 52, and her sister Blanca, 55, had no complaints. "We're supposed to use the service entrance and not go near the lobby, but we get treated well. Three meals a day, everything free," said Maria. .
"It [was] like being in the desert, and then you get to an oasis."

At the pace we are going it will be ironic to see the Country Club Obots who supported Obama have people camping out in their front yards. I wonder if they will put their "Yes We Can" signs up at that time?
Its just a matter of time..............................

Barack Antony - The Neutering of an Election

As I type, we are a few hours away from President Obama’s pep rally, a/k/a State of the Union. It has also been nicknamed the “Prom”, due to the touchy-feely Kumbaya atmosphere being created in order to neuter the new Republican Congress. If what the media is reporting is true regarding his speech, then indeed they will have backed themselves into a corner. Based on CNN’s claim of having the early version of the speech Obama will say:

“With their votes, the American people determined that governing will now be a shared responsibility between parties. New laws will only pass with support from Democrats and Republicans. We will move forward together, or not at all -- for the challenges we face are bigger than party, and bigger than politics.”

If the Republicans keep playing the docile lamb they will miss an opportunity to turn the tables on Obama. Is Obama suggesting that before this election the American people did not want governing to be a shared responsibility? Or how does he come to his conclusion that it should be shared when the election overwhelmingly went against Liberal politics? By using the cliché “We will move forward together, or not at all” did that apply to his ramming the Socialized Medicine Bill down American’s throats without even allowing Republicans in the debate?

Now suddenly, after having created the biggest deficit for any president in the country’s history, the challenges are now bigger? As expected he will make his campaign speech disguised as an attempt to unify different policies, and if they are not careful, the Republicans will play into his hands. By sitting together due to the Arizona shooting, the Republicans have docilely surrendered to the lie that it was politically motivated. Through deceit, Obama is successfully muzzling the mandate that the American people set forth last November. Obama resembles the likes of Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez with his propaganda. He reminds me of Mark Antony supposedly burying Caesar when in fact he has other motives.

Perhaps Obama should begin his speech with….

“Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;”

It would be most appropriate.