Wednesday, October 5, 2011

The Teat Party

It seems that the Socialist faction of the Left has now been joined by the Unions at the "Wall Street Occupation". Or is it that the Unions organized it and are just now showing up? It really doesn't matter. The bottom line is that their true colors are now showing.
I hate to play the prophet here, but I have said for years that once the teat runs dry the violence will come from the welfare queens that feel  they are entitled to everything. One of their many leftist spokespersons Roseanne Barr said so much.

Well, the chickens... er.. umm.. the piglets have come home to roost.

Sunday, August 7, 2011

The Death of NASA Space Program - Gayle Mahon

Today was a sad day. America's space program has been shut down by the Obama administration and 10,000 jobs lost. I heard a commentator say "The next time you see a space shuttle will be in a museum". We were leading the world in space exploration and now..... I also understand that if we should want to go into space, we will have to pay Russia hundreds of thousands of dollars to hitch a ride with them. Who thought we would see this day?

Obama is holding true to his promise to "fundamentally transform" America.  He will transform it into a third world Communist country.  This is only one of many "transformations" taking place since Obama's inauguration.  The majority of Americans either don't take the time to educate themselves on what is happening or, minimize the result all of this will have.  We are in a crisis but, you would never know it to talk to most people.  Please, WAKE UP!!!! 

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Obama's Version of Victory

Obama Mission

Obama's Disdain for Israel Shows Yet Again

President Obama has said Israel needs to give Jerusalem to the Palestinians, thereby creating a "Palestinian State".  The UN votes on this in September.  The United States MUST stand with Israel.  Lt. Col. Alan West (hopefully, soon to be presidential candidate) speaks out FOR Israel.  We had all better decided where we stand on this issue!

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Asking illegals for documentation is bad.......

Asking illegals for documentation is bad.......
but patting down a mentally handicapped man is okay!
Only in Obama's world is it bad to check someones immigration status, but okay to search a mentally handicapped person or even a baby.

TSA Admits ‘Bad Judgment’ After Disabled Man Subjected to Airport Pat-Down

Published June 10, 2011
A Detroit father said agents with the Transportation Security Administration singled out his special-needs son for a pat-down while the family was headed to Disney World, reported, an incident that the TSA admitted was a “case of bad judgment.”
David Mandy said agents at Detroit Metro Airport took his son Drew, 29, and asked him about the padding underneath his pants, which turned out to be adult diapers. Drew, who is severely mentally disabled, had trouble understanding the agents’ orders because his family said he has the mental capacity of a 2-year-old.
When the father tried to intervene and explain Drew’s disability, he said the two agents said, “Please, sir, we know what we’re doing.”
The agents confiscated a six-inch plastic hammer, something Drew had carried with him for 20 years for comfort. Agents called it a security threat, his father said, adding that they tapped the wall with it and said, “See, it’s hard. It could be used as a weapon.”
The family was told they’d have to ship the hammer if they wanted to keep it, David Mandy said.
“I understand they’re trying to keep people safe,” Mandy said told “But come on, does he look like a terrorist?”
In a statement to, the TSA said it’s reviewing the incident but early findings indicate this was an “isolated case of bad judgment.” The TSA reached out to the Mandy family to apologize and said the man’s toy hammer should have never been confiscated.

Read more:

Saturday, June 4, 2011

How Do You Eat An Elephant? Simple, One Bite (election) At A Time

Recently I was given an article taken from "The Rider" written by Burt Prelutsky. It was titled  “Choosing Between Rinos and Libs”.  In this article he wrote the same old jibberish that we often see from those that got us into this mess to begin with.

It’s their contention that it is better to vote for a third party candidate than for a Republican In Name Only (RINO). In response, I have pointed out that a third party candidate can’t win the presidency, and while wasting your vote on one can have the short term benefit of making you feel good about yourself, in the long term, you’re merely making it easier for the liberal to win the election. So while there’s nothing to prevent a conservative casting his vote in 2012 for a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist, in reality he’d be helping to re-elect a left-wing radical named Obama.”
Wasting a vote? How dare this person pass judgment on my right to vote. So in the eyes of the Mr. Prelutsky, any vote that does not prop up the GOP is a wasted vote. If there is any such thing as a wasted vote it is to vote for a candidate or party that will only further damage our country. To him, slow death is preferable to quick death. For some of us we do not see the death of America as a given. Basically he is okay with cooking the proverbial frog. As long as you turn up the heat just a little at a time. The author goes on to further demean true conservatives with statements such as…
“What I have come to believe is that a lot of conservatives don’t really want to elect a president, but, rather, wish to install a dictator. They want someone who will get rid of all those annoying federal departments, bureaucrats and even those pesky checks and balances. For good measure, they’d like Sir Boss to make the Federal Reserve Bank disappear, along with the Supreme Court and just maybe daylight-saving time. While he’s at it, they’d appreciate it if he brought back doubleheaders, 25 cent-a-gallon gas and Tom & Jerry cartoons. The reason I suspect that’s true of many conservatives is because it’s true of me.”
On the contrary, its not that we want a dictator to take these things away, its that we want to remove these already dictatorial things.
“So, while I can certainly understand and even share a great deal of the frustration of those who have no use for RINOS, me or even reality, for that matter, it seems clear that threatening to sit out presidential elections simply because the Republican candidate doesn’t possess all the various attributes and convictions of Ronald Reagan, Ron Paul, Barry Goldwater, Abe Lincoln, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter, is not only antithetical to pro-American conservative principles, but as childish as pinning all of one’s hopes on Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny.”
Oh, I see now, its better to allow the status quo to continue rather than to right the ship.
“A few of them swell themselves up like bantam roosters by quoting Thomas Jefferson about the blood of Tyrants and Patriots occasionally being required to water the tree of Liberty. If you took them seriously, you’d actually have to believe they’re planning an armed insurrection, sitting home oiling their muskets, deciding whether to first target their liberal next-door neighbors or the family of RINOS living on the corner.”
Imagine that, someone thinking that they should oppose tyrannical governments or demanding freedom. Oops! That’s how this country began. While no one is suggesting “shooting” a Rino with a firearm we do want to remove them from office. As for the tyrannical government, one only needs to read the history books as well as the headlines to see that this is happening everyday and the U.S. government is embracing it in other countries. I for one hope that it never comes to that, but I honestly fear that it may due to the apathy that exists within the GOP, as well as America in general. Basically the author is using the old tactic of trying to create the perception that those who embrace conservatism are radicals thus discrediting the movement itself. This is a tried and true liberal tactic. How ironic that a so-called conservative would use it.

“It would be much easier to picture all this if you didn’t know that these are the same folks who get very upset if their Social Security check arrives a day late.”
These “folks” are the ones who were forced to pay into the system and it is only right that they expect to get what was sold to them. Or are they now guilty of having the nerve to not be satisfied with “contributing”?
What I see through all of this are several very enlightening things. The obvious is a disdain for true conservatism, which incidentally is what made this country great. Also I see in the open what was hidden in secret (which I get to say a big I told you so) in that the Tea Party, which the GOP embraced during the last election cycle, which got them into power, is now a bothersome toy that keeps getting in the way. But let me digress a moment and deal with the very weak logic espoused by Mr. Prelutsky. If “Republican lite is better than a Democrat”, then let’s take this through a historical journey that will lead us to a logical conclusion.  For the sake of space and time we will make some very short term comparisons.
  • 50 years ago conservatism was a very definable term. There was a clear line of demarcation between Conservative and  Liberal.
  • 30 years ago we elected Ronald Reagan. By no means a perfect Conservative, but far better than what we have, yet not what we had 20 years before. But hey, he was not a Jimmy Carter.
  • 22 years ago we elected George H. W. Bush. Definitely not a Reagan, and even less than what we had 50 years ago, But hey, he was not a Dukakis.
  • 11 years ago we elected George W. Bush. Definitely not a Reagan or an H.W., and far less than what we had 50 years ago, but at least he was not a Gore or Kerry.
Are you with me so far? Did I miss anything? Oh yes, the years in between. I better get to that before I go on. After Reagan we know that H.W. was president. But then there was a gap. H.W. was only a one termer as Bill Clinton won over the Reagan democrats as there was a blur between Clinton and Bush. The clear line of demarcation was no longer so clear. Bush did not distance himself from Clinton so in essence people were not choosing between Conservative and Liberal, but between Conservative lite and Liberal.
  • Then after 8 years of a disastrous Clinton presidency, out of sheer desperation, as there was no “true conservative” , George W. Bush won. We voted on the basis of the lesser of two evils. Yes, Bush was conservative “even lite lite”, but at least he wasn’t Gore or Kerry.
  • After a lackluster 8 years of George W. Bush, where he failed to accomplish anything substantial with a GOP controlled Congress, it was time to offer a new candidate. Never mind that this was a “Conservative” dream come true. We had a chance to do something and did not. But we consoled ourselves with the thought that he was not Kerry or Gore. Yes we digressed politically, but that was not the point. Or was it?
  • Then 3 years ago we needed that new candidate, someone to take on the ultra liberal Barack Hussein Obama. On a side note we must remember that through all these years the left kept getting more liberal while the right did not get more conservative.  That’s odd, the left got stronger in their convictions while the right got weaker. Its no coincidence that the left grew as the right compromised.
  • So we found that candidate John McCain. No, McCain was no Reagan, not G.H.W Bush, not even a G.W. Bush. For that matter he was more like a Kerry or a Gore than anything else. As a matter of fact, if we go back 50 years, I am not sure he would be recognizable as a Conservative. But once again we said “but he is no Obama”. We cannot throw away a vote by not supporting him. America will be so much worse off with an Obama than a McCain. Granted, America is indeed worse off with an Obama. But would it have been all that different with a McCain? Some may say that this is an extreme statement. I am not saying that McCain would have been an Obama, but he would have been far closer to an Obama than a Reagan.

This brings us to the present. The GOP is rallying behind Mitt Romney among others. He is no Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, or even a McCain. As a matter of fact he once had a socialized mandatory health care system put into place. Much like….. well, Obama. The GOP claims that Romney and a handful of others are better than Obama, and I would concur, but if we keep down this path we are dangerously close to saying 20 years from now that our candidate may be like Obama, but he is no Stalin (although there are some resemblances between Obama and Stalin).
It is obvious that the GOP no longer stands for anything other than getting elected. The GOP in a sense resembles Barack Hussein Obama. In what way you ask? Obama ran on the platform of not being President Bush. It would now seem that the GOP is running on the platform of not being Obama. The GOP no longer stands for what it is, but for what it is not.
It is time to take back the country, with or without the GOP. We can either right the ship or go down with it. As the tile of the article states,” How do you eat an elephant”.  Easy, one bite at a time. That’s what has been done to this point. It is ironic that there is a resemblance between elephants and rinos. I mean the real ones. One is smaller than the other, and if you took a bit off of one, a little at a time of course, they would look very similar. Isn’t that the case with the GOP and Rinos?
I for one say that we either have a GOP that represents conservative values or we find a party that does. Can that cost us an election? Yes, but doing nothing will cost us a country, if it hasn’t done so already.
Now move along Conservatives there is nothing to see here. Just shut up and vote for “not Obama”.

Marxists + Radical Islam = ? - by Gayle Mahon

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

What makes one a socialist/Communist? Entitlements

By Claudia Cadelo: (Claudia is a Cuban dissident)
I met her in 2004, we had a mutual acquaintance, a neighbor of mine. She spent her life in clubs and at concerts, always with boys who came to collect her in a car. I liked her, she was fun. In the afternoons when she woke up sometimes she’d come and have coffee at my house. With her parents abroad, she lived without working and even though she was sometimes short of money, her nights out weren’t affected because the men paid.
Chance, that had one day put us in the same neighborhood, separated us. For years I didn’t hear from her and thought, as is common on this island, that she’d left the country. Recently we ran into each other and I discovered I was right, she lives in New York now and comes to Cuba on vacation. I don’t know what happened, Cubans find so many ways to run away from this land that I don’t even take the trouble to inquire, though the stories can be funny, but also very sad and sinister. Also, I’m a little sensitive on the topic of emigration, wondering who will be here beside me in ten years, when all my friends have left.
In the short time we shared, she told me that she worked a great deal over there, and that generally speaking, she’s considered a communist. “Communist?” I exclaimed, “You were a big fat worm. What happened to you?”
“The system in the United States,” she said, “is inhumane, here it’s better, more humane.”
I looked at her with my mouth hanging open. She doesn’t like the new country where she lives because she has to work; in Cuba she didn’t have to because she was a kept woman. How can you use politics to justify your own inability to be productive?
“I don’t agree with you,” I said, trying to contain the passion that comes over me when people come from a democracy and tell me fairy tales about the dictatorship. “Sure, a lot of people don’t work because the salary is ‘inhumane’ and no one is interested in breaking their back for nothing. But still it seems very good to me that you have to work to earn your own bread. It’s normal.”
“Cubans don’t like to work,” she replied, and then I knew that because she didn’t want to work she assumed everyone else didn’t want to either. What a capacity for generalization!
Before we parted she told me she was about to have an operation. I assumed it would be in Cuba, given what a humane government we have. You can’t even imagine my surprise when she exclaimed, “No! I’m having it over there!”

Thursday, May 19, 2011

I used ti think that the SS stood for something else.....

Wasn't just a few posts ago we talked about Obama's influence over the media? Now it would seem that our law enforcement is being influenced by Obama as well. So FOX is being monitored for having stories that are unflattering of Obama? That should be the story here. Its not a matter of wheteher Obama is becoming a dictator, but of the pace it is happening at.

"Little more than a week after the U.S. Secret Service launched its official Twitter account, the federal law enforcement agency has had a major system failure.
Shortly after 3 p.m. Wednesday, the Secret Service's account declared on the social media site: "Had to monitor Fox for a story. Can't. Deal. With. The. Blathering."
The posting was quickly removed, but within a half-hour dozens of other Twitter users had already begun re-posting -- or "re-Tweeting" -- the message.
"Love the Secret Service tweets!" one Twitter user said.
U.S. Secret Service
U.S. Secret Service
Earlier in the day, Fox News had been covering the story of Vito LaPinta, the 13-year-old from Tacoma, Wash., who was recently visited by a Secret Service agent for posting a message on Facebook suggesting President Obama should watch out for terrorist attacks in the wake of Usama bin Laden's killing. LaPinta's mother was not present when the Secret Service interviewed her son, a move she decried as inappropriate.
On the Twitter post, a spokesman for the Secret Service explained that "an employee with access to the Secret Service's Twitter account ... mistakenly believed they were on their personal account" and posted "an unapproved and inappropriate tweet."
"The tweet did not reflect the views of the U.S. Secret Service and it was immediately removed. We apologize for this mistake, and the user no longer has access to our official account," spokesman Ed Donovan said in a statement to Fox News. "Policies and practices which would have prevented this were not followed and will be reinforced for all account users. We will ensure existing policies are strictly adhered to in order to prevent this mistake from being repeated, and we are conducting appropriate internal follow-up."
The Secret Service launched its Twitter account May 9.
"By using social media sites, we hope to supplement our recruitment efforts, while providing an informative, helpful tool to businesses and individuals who are interested in information from our agency," Secret Service Assistant Director Mickey Nelson said in a statement at the time.
He called the internet "a valuable resource for people all over the world."

Read more:

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Obama truly is shameless

Its not bad enough that he ignores the illegal immigration problem, but now he wants to pander to Hispanics for the 2012 election.
I wonder how long before our military camouflage changes to rainbow color for the homosexual vote?

From FOX
"The Navy's decision to consider naming a cargo ship now under construction after labor activist Cesar Chavez has drawn sharp criticism from one veteran lawmaker who says that a military war hero should receive the honor instead.
Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, said he understands the Navy's desire to honor Hispanic leaders, but the Navy may want to skip the politically divisive names and opt for an outstanding service member.
"If this decision were about recognizing the Hispanic community's contribution to our nation, many other names come to mind, including Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta, who was nominated for the Medal of Honor for action in Iraq. Peralta is one of many Hispanic war heroes -- some of whom are worthy of the same recognition," said Hunter, a Reserve lieutenant in the Marines who says he was informed of the decision by Navy officials Tuesday."

Freedom of the press? Not if you are not an Obot

From Fox - the moral of the story. Don't dare report anything negative against Obama. This is how Chavez, Castro, and other dictators do it as well.

"The Boston Herald has accused the White House of denying its reporter full access to President Obama's local fundraiser Wednesday evening, claiming the Obama administration cited concerns about an op-ed the paper ran more than two months ago by Republican Mitt Romney
Romney, a former Massachusetts governor and possible GOP challenger in the 2012 presidential race, tore into Obama over the economy in his March 8 op-ed, which the Herald played on the front page at the time under the headline, "Why He's Failing." 
The White House didn't forget. 
According to emails published Wednesday in the Herald, when the newspaper tried to sign up for pool reporter duty ahead of Obama's visit to Boston, a White House spokesman questioned whether the newspaper could cover the president fairly. 
"I tend to consider the degree to which papers have demonstrated to covering the White House regularly and fairly in determining local pool reporters," spokesman Matt Lehrich told the Herald in response to its request, according to the newspaper"

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

But Obamacare is WONDERFUL?

I guess Nancy finally read the bill that she said we would have to pass to find out what is in it......

"Of the 204 new Obamacare waivers President Barack Obama’s administration approved in April, 38 are for fancy eateries, hip nightclubs and decadent hotels in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s Northern California district.
That’s in addition to the 27 new waivers for health care or drug companies and the 31 new union waivers Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services approved.
Pelosi’s district secured almost 20 percent of the latest issuance of waivers nationwide, and the companies that won them didn’t have much in common with companies throughout the rest of the country that have received Obamacare waivers.
Other common waiver recipients were labor union chapters, large corporations, financial firms and local governments. But Pelosi’s district’s waivers are the first major examples of luxurious, gourmet restaurants and hotels getting a year-long pass from Obamacare."

While Obama ignores Latin America.....

While Obama ignores Latin America iran is sneaking in.
Taken from Babalublog

German newspaper Die Welt is reporting that Iran is building rocket bases in Venezuela.
German paper says Iranians paid cash to build mid-range missile launch pads on Paraguana Peninsula; Iranian engineers visited site in February.
Iran is building intermediate- range missile launch pads on the Paraguaná Peninsula, and engineers from a construction firm – Khatam al-Anbia – owned by the Revolutionary Guards visited Paraguaná in February. Amir al-Hadschisadeh, the head of the Guard’s Air Force, participated in the visit, according to the report. Die Welt cited information from “Western security insiders.”
The rocket bases are to include measures to prevent air attacks on Venezuela as well as commando and control stations.
The Iranian military involvement in the project extends to bunker, barracks and watch tower construction. Twenty-meter deep rocket silos are planned. The cost of the Venezuelan military project is being paid for with Iranian oil revenue. The Iranians paid in cash for the preliminary phase of the project and, the total cost is expected to amount to “dozens of millions” of dollars, Die Welt wrote.
The Paraguaná Peninsula is on the coast of Venezuela and is roughly 120 kilometers from America’s main South American partner, Columbia.
According to Die Welt, the clandestine agreement between Venezuela and Iran would mean the Chavez government would fire rocket at Iran’s enemies should the Islamic Republic face military strikes.

Monday, May 9, 2011

So what is a debt ceiling for if they keep raising it?


An article is linked below regarding the raising of the debt ceiling scheduled for a vote next week.  Does anyone want to bet the Republicans will cave, again, and raise the ceiling without any MEANINGFUL budget cuts?  Though cynical at this point, I pray they will do the right thing - follow through on their campaign promises.  If they don't, they pound another nail in America's coffin.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Joe legal versus Jose illegal

You have two families: "Joe Legal" and
"Jose Illegal".

Both families have two parents, two children, and live in California .

Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.
Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".

Ready? Now pay attention...

Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.
Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, or $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.
Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.

Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631.00.
Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $ 31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.

Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.
Jose Illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.

Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.

Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

Do you get it, now?

If you vote for or support any politician that supports illegal aliens...

You are part of the problem!

It's way PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!
What are you waiting for? Pass it on.

Where are you? Why do you not speak up?. Our country is in mortal danger.

America is getting overun by illegals and Muslims and all we care about is Survivor and American Idol

Friday, April 22, 2011



First, we did such a great job in Egypt.  Our interference there resulted in the rise to power of the Muslim Brotherhood and such great activities as "virginity squads" targeting young women.  Now, we are going to create another terrorist

Wednesday, April 13, 2011



To those of you who thought Mubarak should be forced out of power in Egypt - Egypt says they will now restore ties to Iran. Amadinejad, apparently, has been encouraged by the changes in Egypt. Good thinking!

Monday, April 11, 2011

Who's Children Are They?

The answer to the question is that the children belong to the state according to Chicago Elementary Schools.
Are we allowing big brother to run our lives to this extent? This is only the beginning.

National Interest

Chicago Elementary School Bans Lunches Brought From Home

Published April 11, 2011

A Chicago public elementary school is under fire from some students and parents for banning school lunches brought from home, the Chicago Tribune reports. 
Little Village Academy, a public school on Chicago's West Side, prohibits students from bringing homemade lunches unless the child has a medical excuse, according to the newspaper. School officials say the rule is meant to encourage healthful eating, as students are forced to eat lunches served in the school cafeteria instead. 
School Principal Elsa Carmona told the newspaper that she created the policy six years ago after observing students bringing "bottles of soda and flaming hot chips" from home. 
"Nutrition wise, it is better for the children to eat at the school," she told the newspaper. "It's about the nutrition and the excellent quality food that they are able to serve (in the lunchroom). It's milk versus a Coke. But with allergies and any medical issue, of course, we would make an exception."
The rule, however, is not popular among students, many of whom opt not to eat the school lunch and instead go hungry, the newspaper reports. 
"Some of the kids don't like the food they give at our school for lunch or breakfast," parent Erica Martinez told the newspaper. "So it would be a good idea if they could bring their lunch so they could at least eat something."

$5 Gas and More Happy News

$5 Gas and More Happy News - by Gayle Mahon

Just read on Drudge, gas could be $5 by Memorial Day. This not only affects our driving but prices for food, clothing, etc. So many wonderful things have happened since we stabbed Mubarak in the back and forced him out in Egypt:
higher gas prices, "virginity" squads checking young women in Egypt, tremendous surge in the persecution of Christians in Egypt, Muslim Brotherhood poised to assume leadership in Egypt, demonstrators (radical islamists) in other Middle Eastern countries emboldened by OUR actions, increased threat to Israel - could go on and on. How many REALLY care about all of this?

We Won?


Thursday, April 7, 2011

So just what is “fair”, and just how much is enough?

So just what is “fair”, and just how much is enough?
With all the hyperbole of the Democrats regarding their desire to soak the “rich”, the above question must be asked. They say that the “rich” should “pay their fair share”.  Yet the Socialist leaning Democrats keep making that statement over and over without defining what their view of fair is. It is obviously not a dollar value as the “rich” pay the majority of Federal earnings taxes in this country. This also begs the questions of just how much is enough. Based on the socialist tactic of generating class envy we can only assume that what the Socialist Democrats want is a total redistribution of wealth. This basically means that money is taken from those who earned it and given to those who did not earn it. This is what the Socialist Democrats call “fair”. So in essence both the questions of “fair” and “enough” are answered with one answer. The goal of the Socialist Democrats is a Socialist state whereby the only wealthy are the ruling party elite.  But for all the Socialist Democrats that salivate at getting even with the “rich”, remember that this isn’t about those that have more than you. This is also about those that have less than you. You see, to other Socialist Democrats you are the evil rich. That means that eventually, as has been the case in other Socialist countries, you will also lose what you earned.
But hey, isn’t that the “fair” thing to do? Enjoy what you have as you will not have it for long.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Playing Politics with our Military


URGENT - per Congressman Yoder (KS), Obama has instructed the Dept. of Defense to NOT PAY our military men and women in harms way if the government shuts down.
OUTRAGEOUS!!!  During the government shutdown in 1995, the military WAS paid. Congressman Yoder has introduced a bill in the House to prevent Obama from doing this

Muslim Fundamentalists' Threat To Israel (they then come for America)

Muslim Fundamentalists' Threat To Israel (they then come for America)
- by Gayle Mahon

Via Stand With Israel: "Muslim fundamentalists are infecting college campuses with their violent anti-Israel lies. Share this video with your friends to help expose the truth about Israel's positive influence on the world."  We did not believe their threats before 9/11, will we believe them now?

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Art or Indendiary?

The most recent excuse of Muslims to murder people is the Koran burning in Florida. Never mind that it was one Koran (not that I feel that there is any value in burning it). But we constantly hear (not through the MSM of course) of Crucifixes in urine, as well as other attacks on Christianty. The latter is excused away as art and freedom of speech, while the former is called incendiary. Thanks to the MSM, America's obsession with catering to Islam continues to grow daily. Its time to stop blaming those who burn Korans, whether we agree with the pastor or not, and start blaming Islam for the constant violence and hate.

Friday, April 1, 2011

Millions Being Paid to Early Retirees of Unions with OUR Tax Dollars

Millions Being Paid to Early Retirees of Unions with OUR Tax Dollars
by Gayle Mahon

Just breaking - Stuart Varney has uncovered that millions in ObamaCare have already been paid out to employees of certain companies/UNIONS retiring at the age of 55. The justification? At age 55, they would have a difficult time getting private insurance - too expensive. Nervermind that they CHOSE early retirement.  This will continue until 2014 when ObamaCare kicks in. Strangely enough, the major receipants of this bribe -uh I mean payout - are UNIONS i.e.
UAW, teacher unions in various states and GE!! So, we give you $ and you suport ObamaCare - isn't that bribery?

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Saturday, March 26, 2011



Our enemy is not just overseas, they are within our gate:



Is this what you think of when you think of France, Great Britian, etc.?



 Remember when we were assured by the Obama administration, mainstream media and even some "conservatives" that the conflict in Egypt was only about allowing true Democracy there and there was no threat from the "secular" Muslim Brotherhood? Really?? The real story has just begun, see below:

Friday, March 25, 2011

Oh Those Zany Peace Loving Muslims Are At It Again

"Thousands of Christians have been forced to flee their homes in Western Ethiopia after Muslim extremists set fire to roughly 50 churches and dozens of Christian homes.
At least one Christian has been killed, many more have been injured and anywhere from 3,000 to 10,000 have been displaced in the attacks that began March 2 after a Christian in the community of Asendabo was accused of desecrating the Koran."

Thursday, March 24, 2011



Believe me, the subject discussed in the article linked below is no accident. We are only just beginning to see the consequences of Obama bullying Mubarak out of power.  Israel will not be the only country to feel these consequences, America will also.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

13 Illegal Immigrants Arrested in California Wearing U.S. Marine Uniforms

Only in America......

"Border Patrol agents recently arrested 13 illegal immigrants disguised as U.S. Marines and riding in a fake military van, U.S. Customs and Border Protection said Tuesday.
The illegal immigrants were clad in Marine uniforms when they were apprehended at the Campo Border Patrol Westbound I-8 checkpoint at 11 p.m. on March 14 near Pine Valley, Calif., border officials said. Two U.S. citizens in the van also were arrested.
After the suspicious white van was subjected to secondary inspection, it was determined that the driver of the vehicle and its front seat passenger were U.S. citizens who were attempting to smuggle 13 illegal immigrants into the United States. All of the vehicle's occupants wore U.S. Marine uniforms, reportedly emblazoned with the name "Perez."
"This effort is an example of the lengths smugglers will go to avoid detection, and the skilled and effective police work and vigilance displayed everyday by Customs and Border Protection personnel," the agency said in a written statement."

Monday, March 21, 2011

Impeach Obama? A Prominent Dem Says Its Possible

WASHINGTON – In an exclusive interview with Raw Story on Monday, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) tore into President Barack Obama's decision to order U.S. air strikes against Libya, opening the door for impeachment while emphatically declaring that Obama violated the Constitution.
"President Obama moved forward without Congress approving. He didn't have Congressional authorization, he has gone against the Constitution, and that's got to be said," Kucinich told Raw Story. "It's not even disputable, this isn't even a close question. Such an action -- that involves putting America's service men and women into harm's way, whether they're in the Air Force or the Navy -- is a grave decision that cannot be made by the president alone."

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Judicial Tyranny.....Again

by - Gayle Mahon

These people on the left, Progressives, Marxists, Socialists, etc.',  just will not let go.  Click on link below to read how a Wisconsin judge has stayed Governor Walker's bill.  As Nancy Pelosi oce said regarding ObamaCare:  "“We’ll go through the gate. If the gate’s closed, we’ll go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole vault in. If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in but we're going to get health care reform passed for the American people."  That quote applies to all of their agenda items.  Obama, not being able to get Cap and Trade, Net Neutrality, gun control; goes AROUND Congress to various Agencies headed by his Czars.  He uses REGULATION rather than Legislation.  This has to be unconstitutional!  Congress needs to defund these agencies participating in this end run around them. 

One thing can be said for the Left, they find a way to get their agenda through.  We need to learn from that.  Unfortunately, we are too "nice" or want to "get along" - whatever.  We no longer have that luxury.  To borrow Nancy's words "we'll parachute in......for the American people".


by - Gayle Mahon

European leaders meeting last week with Hilary Clinton are confused on exactly what our position is in Libya - see article linked below:

It really is not a mystery if you put it all  together.  Egypt is first up on the list.  When our ally and friend of Israel, Hosni Mubarak, needed our

assistance in preventing the takeover of the Egyptian government by the Muslim Brotherhood, we demanded he step down immediately.  Say what you will about

Mubarak, he has been our ally for 30+ years and one of two Arab countries who has a peace treaty with Israel.  In other words, Egypt under his rule, was a

stabilizing force in the Middle East.  Moving onto Iran.  When legitimate democracy seeking protesters gathered in Iran's streets what did we do?  Can you

hear the crickets?  NOTHING, we did nothing.  Did Obama demand a well-documented murderer and torturer of his people step down? NO.  Achmedinajad, the leader who has never been a friend to America but always the worst of enemies, the man who spits in our face?  NO.  We left these people to "disappear" or be murdered in the

streets.  Now we have Libya. Apparently, Obama is not in a hurry to get rid of Qaddafi.  Qaddafi  who is the man behind the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 and the attack

on the US Marine Barracks in 1983 that killed 200+ Marines?  The Obama administration, just this week, demanded Qaddafi step down.  However, it was said with such a lack of passion and enforcement, it makes little difference. As detailed in the above article, Hilary Clinton when asked by some G-8 leaders why America's position is not more firm said "there are difficulties".  What are those "difficulties" ?  Moving against Mubarak does not have the support of Russia and Red China.  Well, of course, we now allow our foreign policy to be dictated by these two countries?  So, what does all this mean?  The Obama administration supports Muslim countries that are radical, fundamentalist Islamists, to the point of stoning women; enemies of Israel; enemies of America; enemies of freedom.  He moves AGAINST Muslim countries that are more secular, at peace with Israel, allies of America; and have at least limited freedoms.  Obama has also done nothing about our allies the countries of Jordan and Behrain as they fight their uprisings.  This man tells us all the time who he is, in word and deed.   WHY DO SO FEW BELIEVE HIM???

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

So why do people link Obama to Hitler?

by- Gayle Mahon

"He alone who owns the youth, gains the future."  - Adolf Hitler

Linked below is an article detailing how the Feds want to monitor your child's conversations and Facebook.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011


by Gayle Mahon

For how many weeks now has the House passed CR's (Continuing Resolutions)? These CR's cut NOTHING and allow our budget crisis to deepen.  Once again, we are allowing the Democrats and establishment Republicans to dictate the rules of the game.  Solution?  The Republicans need to take a stand, similar to the one taken by Scott Walker, and say "No more".  If a full budget cannot be voted that stops the bleeding out, then the Republicans need to allow the Democrats to follow through on their threat to shut the government down.  Senator Marco Rubio, Florida, is leading the charge of the few saying they will vote for no more CR's - see article linked below:

Monday, March 14, 2011



When the father of Baby Joseph was interviewed today, through tears, he said because of America, his son now has freedom - freedom to possibly live. For all the America bashers, where else in the world do people go when they need help?
For all of us who love our Country - we must preserve the freedoms we have inherited. We must honor those who have died though the years to give us this freedom.

St. Louis hospital gets chance to treat 'Baby Joseph'

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Don't They Realize Who I Am? I am a "Jackpot"!

Once in a while, an article grabs you and makes you laugh for the irony of things. In this case its the elitist attitude of the Main Stream Media. The MSM feels that they are far superior to the rest of the world, and that they are above experiencing anything that others go through. They are used to the free passes, the exclusive views, and the special treatment. Through all of this, they choose between what is news, and what is news that will be reported. We saw this in the Wisconsin protests when a FOX reporter was physically attacked and it was not reported. We saw it when the Union thug protesters attacked a Republican Senator and it was not reported. We saw this when death threats were made by the Union Left and it was not reported, or rather we did not see any of these stories, as it is not part of the cause.

But as this has been seen, or rather not seen, depending on how you look at it, it was entertaining to see the latest occurrence. Let me set the stage for you. The MSM has decided who should, or who should not be in power in the Middle East. Basically the criteria is that anyone that does not have enough hatred towards Israel, and is not sympathetic to Muslim extremists, needs to be replaced. While most leaders in the Middle East are thugs to begin with, it becomes a dictator of your choice game. In this case the reporter is in Libya.

The reporter is Nic Robertson of CNN and he is, as he puts it in his own words, "the jackpot".

For a few moments today, for us personally, Libya’s lies and deceit were swept aside and the real deal was brutally exposed.“Itla, itla” "Get in the car, get in the car!" he was screaming. My cameraman, Khalil Abdallah, and I hesitated for a split-second. But that's all it was. We were staring down the barrel of an AK-47, the weapon was jumping in his hands. He was cocking it, wrenching the handle back, a bullet being slammed into the firing chamber. It was only a split-second. We are free to go anywhere, any time, talk to who we want, when we want. That's what Moammar Gadhafi’s son told me, that's what Libya told the U.N. We already knew it was all lies look at any number of our colleagues, arrested, detained, in some cases, beaten but today it came home to us personally.The hyper-aggressive jerk with the gun had just hit the jackpot. There was him and three others. They were grabbing us, bundling us towards their pickup truck. He had a pistol in his belt, one of the others kept his AK trained on us too, and an older guy with the grey beard was speed-dialing his phone. These are Gadhafi’s enforcers. They were looking for us.`..."

Ahhh.... the jackpot. Why is this an issue? Well you see, CNN has a bureau office in Havana, Cuba. This is a prized position for CNN. It allows them coverage in Cuba, or rather it allows them sometimes exclusive coverage, of what their handlers tell them to report. But what is the relationship between Cuba and Libya in this case? The obvious is that what Mr. Jackpot experienced goes on in Cuba on a daily basis. In February alone over 300 times. But the difference is that these 300 or so were not "the jackpot". The 300 others were an inconvenient truth that CNN would never report on, as the Cuban regime would then deprive CNN of their valuable Havana office.

CNN only has issues with certain dictators. Some are tolerated, and some are not. In the case of Mubarak, he was an intolerable dictator. While in the case of Castro, he is tolerable to CNN. Its just a matter of what the MSM feels is good for its subjects, or rather, its readers.  So major stories will run about Mubarak's three decades in power, yet not about Castro's five decades. About the mass graves in Iraq, but not about the mass graves in Cuba. About the tens of arrests of political prisoners in the Middle East, yet not about the thousands in Cuba. About the manhandling of a man named Nic Roberston in Libya, yet not about the manhandling of elderly women who are the wives of Cuba's political dissidents.

Whats the difference? Nic Robertson is "the jackpot". The Cuban people are not to CNN, only their Havana Bureau office is.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

But I thought NPR rejected the $5 MILLION......

It looks like NPR lied......
NPR sells news coverage.
They also offer to shield the Muslim donor.......

Who wants to control people's lives?

Some things just can't be said any better. Thanks to the Patriots over at Babalublog

by George Moneo in response to the claim by the now ex NPR exec that Conservatives want to control people's lives.

"So we conservatives want to control the lives of Americans? I have some questions for this boob:
  • Who wants to control what you eat?
  • Who wants to control what legal tobacco products you use?
  • Who wants to control your firearms?
  • Who wants to control what you hear on the radio?
  • Who wants to control what you see on TV?
  • Who wants to control what you see on the Internet?
  • Who wants to control how you get your health care?
  • Who wants to control how the local communities handle their citizen's business?
  • Who wants to control how you spend your money by imposing higher and higher taxes and fees?
Liberals have a "higher education" and they can't even ask these simple questions?
Look, real conservatives want to leave you alone and want to be left alone. Period. We want to live our lives with the least amount of oversight and interference, just as the founders intended. The next time a liberal or progressive throws out the canard that we want to control lives because of some nebulous "Christian" agenda, just laugh in their face and read them this list. Their lies and their socialist fantasies are beyond parody. "

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Dissection of a Tyranny - a/k/a Sneak Preview of the Obama Plan

If people refuse to listen to those of us who used to live under a socialist regime, perhaps they will listen to those who still do. Read the article below then ask yourself if it reminds you of Obama as well as the Wisconsin protestors. Class warfare is the stage for socialistic takeovers.

Dissection of a Tyranny (Part I)
By Jose Luis Garcia Paneque:
Below is the source

"I am a doctor by profession, but I ask my readers not to worry, for I am not attempting to take the scalpel to perform plastic surgery on the ruling dictatorship in Cuba.  It would be an impossible task and it would leave me very frustrated.  I also do not wish to hold a philosophy conference.
I will attempt to return to my stage as a student and will perform an ANATOMICAL DISSECTION on the modus operandi of the Cuban regime, based on the postulates of Saint Thomas of Aquinas (1224-1274) in regards to the maintenance of dictatorships.  Although this is based on a thesis which was formulated more than 7 centuries ago, the reality is that with the passing of time, dictators have adapted it to their own circumstances , but the essence of it has not changed.
I can only hope that future generations will only have to study this as a historic event and not as a reality in practice.
For the sustenance of a tyranny, Saint Thomas presented us with 9 different postulates.  In the same number of posts, we will try to compare these postulates with the actions of the Cuban dictatorship throughout the past 52 years.
1. For the maintenance of tyranny, it is very important to execute those who are most rich and powerful, for these people are the ones who can confront the Tyrant thanks to the authority they possess.
We must recall how an important amount of the most creative and productive sector of Cubans were shoved into exile from the beginning of the so-called “Revolution”.  For the “revolutionaries”, it became a sin to possess any sort of wealth.  The new regime contaminated the Cuban people with the first germs of hate and resentment against any person who was an entrepreneur, which was converted into a word synonymous of a “bourgeois who exploited the grand proletariat masses”.
During the radicalization of this process, known as “Revolutionary Offensive” of 1968, not only were the principal means of production and services confiscated, but so too were even the most miserable of small businesses, under the fallacy that the extreme socialization of all goods was to give it to the deserving masses.  With the nationalization of all economic life, any sign of prosperity among the population was slaughtered.  The objective was beyond clear: “kill the most rich and prosperous”, but not in the medieval style.  Instead, they opted for “social death”.  Upon converting the prosperous into poor, and the poor into miserable, Fidel Castro’s regime assassinated any possibility of personal autonomy and assured a total social dependency on the government structures.  The final nail on the coffin was the establishment of the Rationing Card, which has now resulted to be untenable in their quest to dominate the country.
But tyrannies don’t limit themselves to only one front of action to assure their existence.  In the following post, we will compare another one of the postulates of Saint Thomas of Aquinas in regards to the methods applied by the Castro elite. "

Dictators Feel That The Internet Must Be Policed

Castro and Chavez feel that the Internet is a threat to their supreme power. Funny that Obama seems to feel the same way.

It looks like the late Cuban aposltle of liberty was right when he said
"Only oppression should fear the full exercise of freedom."
– José Martí (1853-1895), Cuban apostle of liberty

h/t Gayle Mahon

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

NPR is indeed National Palestine Radio

NPR is indeed National Palestine Radio - as well as the anti-Tea Party Network. But don't forget that they are unbiased. Yeah right.....
BTW - They say that they do not want public funding. So let's do what they say!

The Left Feels That Parents Should Bow To Their Children

Contributed by Gayle Mahon

Below is a link to a speech made by Van Jones (former Green Jobs Czar for Obama and self-admitted Communist) recently at Colorado College.  In this speech, he tells these young people THEY know more than their parents and are a type of god.  Could this be planting seeds of rebellion?

Monday, March 7, 2011

White House Praises Muslims

"The White House is pushing a message of religious tolerance ahead of this week's congressional hearing on Islamic radicalism, which has sparked protests on grounds it unfairly singles out Muslims as potential terrorists.
President Barack Obama sent his deputy national security adviser, Denis McDonough, on Sunday to a Washington-area mosque known for its cooperation with the FBI and its rejection of the al-Qaida brand of Islam.
"Being religious is never un-American. Being religious is quintessentially American," McDonough said."

"Washington-area mosque known for its cooperation with the FBI and its rejection of the al-Qaida brand of Islam."? Talk about double speak. If Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism, then how is it that they cooperate with the FBI? Reports are that they inform on the terrorists. If so, then how do they know who they are? What is their common bond? OOPS! Its Islam and their mosques. It looks like the upcoming hearings are a good idea after all.