Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Joe legal versus Jose illegal

PLEASE READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT THE PROBLEM
You have two families: "Joe Legal" and
"Jose Illegal".

Both families have two parents, two children, and live in California .

Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.
Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".

Ready? Now pay attention...

Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.
Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, or $31,200.00 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.
Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.

Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.


Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $9,631.00.
Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $ 31,200.00.
Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.

Jose Illegal says, "We don't need no stinkin' insurance!" and still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc.
Jose Illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month.

Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.

Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

Do you get it, now?

If you vote for or support any politician that supports illegal aliens...

You are part of the problem!

It's way PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!
What are you waiting for? Pass it on.

Where are you? Why do you not speak up?. Our country is in mortal danger.



America is getting overun by illegals and Muslims and all we care about is Survivor and American Idol

Friday, April 22, 2011

OBAMA GIVES 25 MILLION TO POSSIBLE TERRORISTS

OBAMA GIVES 25 MILLION TO POSSIBLE TERRORISTS -by Gayle Mahon

First, we did such a great job in Egypt.  Our interference there resulted in the rise to power of the Muslim Brotherhood and such great activities as "virginity squads" targeting young women.  Now, we are going to create another terrorist
state:

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

A NEW MIDDLE EAST IS EMERGING - NOT GOOD FOR AMERICA

A NEW MIDDLE EAST IS EMERGING - NOT GOOD FOR AMERICA - By Gayle Mahon

To those of you who thought Mubarak should be forced out of power in Egypt - Egypt says they will now restore ties to Iran. Amadinejad, apparently, has been encouraged by the changes in Egypt. Good thinking!

Monday, April 11, 2011

Who's Children Are They?

The answer to the question is that the children belong to the state according to Chicago Elementary Schools.
Are we allowing big brother to run our lives to this extent? This is only the beginning.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/04/11/chicago-elementary-school-bans-lunches-brought-home/?test=latestnews

National Interest

Chicago Elementary School Bans Lunches Brought From Home

Published April 11, 2011
| FoxNews.com

A Chicago public elementary school is under fire from some students and parents for banning school lunches brought from home, the Chicago Tribune reports. 
Little Village Academy, a public school on Chicago's West Side, prohibits students from bringing homemade lunches unless the child has a medical excuse, according to the newspaper. School officials say the rule is meant to encourage healthful eating, as students are forced to eat lunches served in the school cafeteria instead. 
School Principal Elsa Carmona told the newspaper that she created the policy six years ago after observing students bringing "bottles of soda and flaming hot chips" from home. 
"Nutrition wise, it is better for the children to eat at the school," she told the newspaper. "It's about the nutrition and the excellent quality food that they are able to serve (in the lunchroom). It's milk versus a Coke. But with allergies and any medical issue, of course, we would make an exception."
The rule, however, is not popular among students, many of whom opt not to eat the school lunch and instead go hungry, the newspaper reports. 
"Some of the kids don't like the food they give at our school for lunch or breakfast," parent Erica Martinez told the newspaper. "So it would be a good idea if they could bring their lunch so they could at least eat something."

$5 Gas and More Happy News

$5 Gas and More Happy News - by Gayle Mahon

Just read on Drudge, gas could be $5 by Memorial Day. This not only affects our driving but prices for food, clothing, etc. So many wonderful things have happened since we stabbed Mubarak in the back and forced him out in Egypt:
higher gas prices, "virginity" squads checking young women in Egypt, tremendous surge in the persecution of Christians in Egypt, Muslim Brotherhood poised to assume leadership in Egypt, demonstrators (radical islamists) in other Middle Eastern countries emboldened by OUR actions, increased threat to Israel - could go on and on. How many REALLY care about all of this?

We Won?

THE BUDGET DEAL WAS NOT A VICTORY FOR CONSERVATIVES: - by Gayle Mahon

Thursday, April 7, 2011

So just what is “fair”, and just how much is enough?

So just what is “fair”, and just how much is enough?
With all the hyperbole of the Democrats regarding their desire to soak the “rich”, the above question must be asked. They say that the “rich” should “pay their fair share”.  Yet the Socialist leaning Democrats keep making that statement over and over without defining what their view of fair is. It is obviously not a dollar value as the “rich” pay the majority of Federal earnings taxes in this country. This also begs the questions of just how much is enough. Based on the socialist tactic of generating class envy we can only assume that what the Socialist Democrats want is a total redistribution of wealth. This basically means that money is taken from those who earned it and given to those who did not earn it. This is what the Socialist Democrats call “fair”. So in essence both the questions of “fair” and “enough” are answered with one answer. The goal of the Socialist Democrats is a Socialist state whereby the only wealthy are the ruling party elite.  But for all the Socialist Democrats that salivate at getting even with the “rich”, remember that this isn’t about those that have more than you. This is also about those that have less than you. You see, to other Socialist Democrats you are the evil rich. That means that eventually, as has been the case in other Socialist countries, you will also lose what you earned.
But hey, isn’t that the “fair” thing to do? Enjoy what you have as you will not have it for long.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Playing Politics with our Military

OBAMA DIRECTIVE:  STOP PAYING THE MILITARY - by Gayle Mahon

URGENT - per Congressman Yoder (KS), Obama has instructed the Dept. of Defense to NOT PAY our military men and women in harms way if the government shuts down.
OUTRAGEOUS!!!  During the government shutdown in 1995, the military WAS paid. Congressman Yoder has introduced a bill in the House to prevent Obama from doing this

Muslim Fundamentalists' Threat To Israel (they then come for America)

Muslim Fundamentalists' Threat To Israel (they then come for America)
- by Gayle Mahon

Via Stand With Israel: "Muslim fundamentalists are infecting college campuses with their violent anti-Israel lies. Share this video with your friends to help expose the truth about Israel's positive influence on the world."  We did not believe their threats before 9/11, will we believe them now? 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByMufgpcdnI&feature=player_embedded#at=282

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Art or Indendiary?

The most recent excuse of Muslims to murder people is the Koran burning in Florida. Never mind that it was one Koran (not that I feel that there is any value in burning it). But we constantly hear (not through the MSM of course) of Crucifixes in urine, as well as other attacks on Christianty. The latter is excused away as art and freedom of speech, while the former is called incendiary. Thanks to the MSM, America's obsession with catering to Islam continues to grow daily. Its time to stop blaming those who burn Korans, whether we agree with the pastor or not, and start blaming Islam for the constant violence and hate.

Friday, April 1, 2011

Millions Being Paid to Early Retirees of Unions with OUR Tax Dollars

Millions Being Paid to Early Retirees of Unions with OUR Tax Dollars
by Gayle Mahon

Just breaking - Stuart Varney has uncovered that millions in ObamaCare have already been paid out to employees of certain companies/UNIONS retiring at the age of 55. The justification? At age 55, they would have a difficult time getting private insurance - too expensive. Nervermind that they CHOSE early retirement.  This will continue until 2014 when ObamaCare kicks in. Strangely enough, the major receipants of this bribe -uh I mean payout - are UNIONS i.e.
UAW, teacher unions in various states and GE!! So, we give you $ and you suport ObamaCare - isn't that bribery?