Showing posts with label socialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label socialism. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

The Teat Party


It seems that the Socialist faction of the Left has now been joined by the Unions at the "Wall Street Occupation". Or is it that the Unions organized it and are just now showing up? It really doesn't matter. The bottom line is that their true colors are now showing.
I hate to play the prophet here, but I have said for years that once the teat runs dry the violence will come from the welfare queens that feel  they are entitled to everything. One of their many leftist spokespersons Roseanne Barr said so much.



Well, the chickens... er.. umm.. the piglets have come home to roost.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

What makes one a socialist/Communist? Entitlements

By Claudia Cadelo: (Claudia is a Cuban dissident)
I met her in 2004, we had a mutual acquaintance, a neighbor of mine. She spent her life in clubs and at concerts, always with boys who came to collect her in a car. I liked her, she was fun. In the afternoons when she woke up sometimes she’d come and have coffee at my house. With her parents abroad, she lived without working and even though she was sometimes short of money, her nights out weren’t affected because the men paid.
Chance, that had one day put us in the same neighborhood, separated us. For years I didn’t hear from her and thought, as is common on this island, that she’d left the country. Recently we ran into each other and I discovered I was right, she lives in New York now and comes to Cuba on vacation. I don’t know what happened, Cubans find so many ways to run away from this land that I don’t even take the trouble to inquire, though the stories can be funny, but also very sad and sinister. Also, I’m a little sensitive on the topic of emigration, wondering who will be here beside me in ten years, when all my friends have left.
In the short time we shared, she told me that she worked a great deal over there, and that generally speaking, she’s considered a communist. “Communist?” I exclaimed, “You were a big fat worm. What happened to you?”
“The system in the United States,” she said, “is inhumane, here it’s better, more humane.”
I looked at her with my mouth hanging open. She doesn’t like the new country where she lives because she has to work; in Cuba she didn’t have to because she was a kept woman. How can you use politics to justify your own inability to be productive?
“I don’t agree with you,” I said, trying to contain the passion that comes over me when people come from a democracy and tell me fairy tales about the dictatorship. “Sure, a lot of people don’t work because the salary is ‘inhumane’ and no one is interested in breaking their back for nothing. But still it seems very good to me that you have to work to earn your own bread. It’s normal.”
“Cubans don’t like to work,” she replied, and then I knew that because she didn’t want to work she assumed everyone else didn’t want to either. What a capacity for generalization!
Before we parted she told me she was about to have an operation. I assumed it would be in Cuba, given what a humane government we have. You can’t even imagine my surprise when she exclaimed, “No! I’m having it over there!”

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Freedom of the press? Not if you are not an Obot

From Fox - the moral of the story. Don't dare report anything negative against Obama. This is how Chavez, Castro, and other dictators do it as well.

"The Boston Herald has accused the White House of denying its reporter full access to President Obama's local fundraiser Wednesday evening, claiming the Obama administration cited concerns about an op-ed the paper ran more than two months ago by Republican Mitt Romney
Romney, a former Massachusetts governor and possible GOP challenger in the 2012 presidential race, tore into Obama over the economy in his March 8 op-ed, which the Herald played on the front page at the time under the headline, "Why He's Failing." 
The White House didn't forget. 
According to emails published Wednesday in the Herald, when the newspaper tried to sign up for pool reporter duty ahead of Obama's visit to Boston, a White House spokesman questioned whether the newspaper could cover the president fairly. 
"I tend to consider the degree to which papers have demonstrated to covering the White House regularly and fairly in determining local pool reporters," spokesman Matt Lehrich told the Herald in response to its request, according to the newspaper"

Monday, April 11, 2011

Who's Children Are They?

The answer to the question is that the children belong to the state according to Chicago Elementary Schools.
Are we allowing big brother to run our lives to this extent? This is only the beginning.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/04/11/chicago-elementary-school-bans-lunches-brought-home/?test=latestnews

National Interest

Chicago Elementary School Bans Lunches Brought From Home

Published April 11, 2011
| FoxNews.com

A Chicago public elementary school is under fire from some students and parents for banning school lunches brought from home, the Chicago Tribune reports. 
Little Village Academy, a public school on Chicago's West Side, prohibits students from bringing homemade lunches unless the child has a medical excuse, according to the newspaper. School officials say the rule is meant to encourage healthful eating, as students are forced to eat lunches served in the school cafeteria instead. 
School Principal Elsa Carmona told the newspaper that she created the policy six years ago after observing students bringing "bottles of soda and flaming hot chips" from home. 
"Nutrition wise, it is better for the children to eat at the school," she told the newspaper. "It's about the nutrition and the excellent quality food that they are able to serve (in the lunchroom). It's milk versus a Coke. But with allergies and any medical issue, of course, we would make an exception."
The rule, however, is not popular among students, many of whom opt not to eat the school lunch and instead go hungry, the newspaper reports. 
"Some of the kids don't like the food they give at our school for lunch or breakfast," parent Erica Martinez told the newspaper. "So it would be a good idea if they could bring their lunch so they could at least eat something."

Thursday, April 7, 2011

So just what is “fair”, and just how much is enough?

So just what is “fair”, and just how much is enough?
With all the hyperbole of the Democrats regarding their desire to soak the “rich”, the above question must be asked. They say that the “rich” should “pay their fair share”.  Yet the Socialist leaning Democrats keep making that statement over and over without defining what their view of fair is. It is obviously not a dollar value as the “rich” pay the majority of Federal earnings taxes in this country. This also begs the questions of just how much is enough. Based on the socialist tactic of generating class envy we can only assume that what the Socialist Democrats want is a total redistribution of wealth. This basically means that money is taken from those who earned it and given to those who did not earn it. This is what the Socialist Democrats call “fair”. So in essence both the questions of “fair” and “enough” are answered with one answer. The goal of the Socialist Democrats is a Socialist state whereby the only wealthy are the ruling party elite.  But for all the Socialist Democrats that salivate at getting even with the “rich”, remember that this isn’t about those that have more than you. This is also about those that have less than you. You see, to other Socialist Democrats you are the evil rich. That means that eventually, as has been the case in other Socialist countries, you will also lose what you earned.
But hey, isn’t that the “fair” thing to do? Enjoy what you have as you will not have it for long.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Judicial Tyranny.....Again

by - Gayle Mahon

These people on the left, Progressives, Marxists, Socialists, etc.',  just will not let go.  Click on link below to read how a Wisconsin judge has stayed Governor Walker's bill.  As Nancy Pelosi oce said regarding ObamaCare:  "“We’ll go through the gate. If the gate’s closed, we’ll go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole vault in. If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in but we're going to get health care reform passed for the American people."  That quote applies to all of their agenda items.  Obama, not being able to get Cap and Trade, Net Neutrality, gun control; goes AROUND Congress to various Agencies headed by his Czars.  He uses REGULATION rather than Legislation.  This has to be unconstitutional!  Congress needs to defund these agencies participating in this end run around them. 


One thing can be said for the Left, they find a way to get their agenda through.  We need to learn from that.  Unfortunately, we are too "nice" or want to "get along" - whatever.  We no longer have that luxury.  To borrow Nancy's words "we'll parachute in......for the American people".

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Dissection of a Tyranny - a/k/a Sneak Preview of the Obama Plan

If people refuse to listen to those of us who used to live under a socialist regime, perhaps they will listen to those who still do. Read the article below then ask yourself if it reminds you of Obama as well as the Wisconsin protestors. Class warfare is the stage for socialistic takeovers.

Dissection of a Tyranny (Part I)
By Jose Luis Garcia Paneque:
Below is the source
http://babalublog.com/2011/03/dissection-of-a-tyranny-part-i/



"I am a doctor by profession, but I ask my readers not to worry, for I am not attempting to take the scalpel to perform plastic surgery on the ruling dictatorship in Cuba.  It would be an impossible task and it would leave me very frustrated.  I also do not wish to hold a philosophy conference.
I will attempt to return to my stage as a student and will perform an ANATOMICAL DISSECTION on the modus operandi of the Cuban regime, based on the postulates of Saint Thomas of Aquinas (1224-1274) in regards to the maintenance of dictatorships.  Although this is based on a thesis which was formulated more than 7 centuries ago, the reality is that with the passing of time, dictators have adapted it to their own circumstances , but the essence of it has not changed.
I can only hope that future generations will only have to study this as a historic event and not as a reality in practice.
For the sustenance of a tyranny, Saint Thomas presented us with 9 different postulates.  In the same number of posts, we will try to compare these postulates with the actions of the Cuban dictatorship throughout the past 52 years.
1. For the maintenance of tyranny, it is very important to execute those who are most rich and powerful, for these people are the ones who can confront the Tyrant thanks to the authority they possess.
We must recall how an important amount of the most creative and productive sector of Cubans were shoved into exile from the beginning of the so-called “Revolution”.  For the “revolutionaries”, it became a sin to possess any sort of wealth.  The new regime contaminated the Cuban people with the first germs of hate and resentment against any person who was an entrepreneur, which was converted into a word synonymous of a “bourgeois who exploited the grand proletariat masses”.
During the radicalization of this process, known as “Revolutionary Offensive” of 1968, not only were the principal means of production and services confiscated, but so too were even the most miserable of small businesses, under the fallacy that the extreme socialization of all goods was to give it to the deserving masses.  With the nationalization of all economic life, any sign of prosperity among the population was slaughtered.  The objective was beyond clear: “kill the most rich and prosperous”, but not in the medieval style.  Instead, they opted for “social death”.  Upon converting the prosperous into poor, and the poor into miserable, Fidel Castro’s regime assassinated any possibility of personal autonomy and assured a total social dependency on the government structures.  The final nail on the coffin was the establishment of the Rationing Card, which has now resulted to be untenable in their quest to dominate the country.
But tyrannies don’t limit themselves to only one front of action to assure their existence.  In the following post, we will compare another one of the postulates of Saint Thomas of Aquinas in regards to the methods applied by the Castro elite. "

Dictators Feel That The Internet Must Be Policed

Castro and Chavez feel that the Internet is a threat to their supreme power. Funny that Obama seems to feel the same way.

https://grassroots.cc/gods_act_3_WND

It looks like the late Cuban aposltle of liberty was right when he said
"Only oppression should fear the full exercise of freedom."
– José Martí (1853-1895), Cuban apostle of liberty

h/t Gayle Mahon

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Look for the Union...er....um... I mean the Socialist label

Look for the Union Socialist  label
So Unions, and the latest uprising in Wisconsin are not about Socialism? Someone better tell the Unions.
For decades people like me havebeen trying to warn Americans about the link between Unions and Socialism and people tried to deny it. There is no denying it now.
p.s. Notice Obama's, as well as the MSM's silence?

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

The Reality of Madison

This is what is really behind the protests in Madison. Liberals and Democrats can argue all day that this is not about Socialism. But we hear it right from the horses mouth here. Please excuse the curse word used by the socialist , but I have no way of editing it out. Those in attendance at this meeting include local unions.


Simply amazing!

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Muslims Terrorists = Union Thugs?

After seeing and hearing the accounts of the behavior of the Union thugs the comparison between them and Muslim Terrorists is a valid one. See the examples below.
This is awfully reminiscent of terroristic tactics. It seems that the Unions are threatened by their potential loss of power that they are now assaulting reporters. This is a direct attack of free speech. It just shows how much truth there is to the socialistic nature of Unions.  Also the hostile takeover of the Wisconsin Statehouse, as well as the Police Force's disobedience (union members as well) to orders is a direct reflection of the anarchy the President Obama is teaching by his example in not defending the laws of the land. This was seen this week when he refused to defend the laws of the land in direct opposition to the oath that he took. If these events do not seem important to you then you will be unpleasantly surprised by the eventual outcome of this. This has the potential of being the turning point in leading America into a dictatorial socialist state. It is time to take back America as it is close to becoming too late.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Obamacare - Sneak Preview

Get ready for Big Brother Obama to tell you whats best...... If you want to run to the U.S. to avoid socialized medicine your time is running out.

So where do we run to from here? Or do we stop Obamacare so we do not have to run?

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/02/24/canadian-family-life-support-battle-denied-request-hospital-transfer/?test=latestnews

Canadian Family in Life Support Battle Denied Request for Hospital Transfer

"The parents of a Canadian boy ordered off life support by government health officials have been denied a request to transfer the 13-month-old to the Children’s Hospital of Michigan.

London Health Sciences Centre in Ontario, Canada, was advised Thursday by the Michigan hospital that the boy would not be transferred.
Moe Maraachli and his wife, Sana Nader, of Windsor, Ontario, wanted the Michigan hospital to perform a tracheotomy on their son Joseph, who is currently kept alive by a respirator. The boy suffers from a rare, progressive neurological disease which, Canadian doctors say, has left him in a vegetative state beyond recovery.
A spokesman for Maraachli told FoxNews.com the family is "working on an appeal" to the Michigan hospital's decision. The hospital declined to comment on "any matters surrounding the case."
Joseph’s parents believed that if the Detroit hospital had accepted the child and conducted the operation, in which doctors would place a breathing tube in his windpipe, he could be cared for at home.
Canadian health care allocation officials already ruled that Joseph had to be taken off life support and allowed to die in the hospital. A Canadian judge then ruled that Maraachli had to give his consent to having the breathing tube removed by Monday. He refused.
Health care economist Dr. Devon Herrick, a senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis, said the structure of the Canadian health care system allows public officials to make patient care decisions.
“Hospitals have global budgets as opposed to charging patients or their insurance companies, so the officials would have far more power over what their individual hospitals do,” Herrick said. "If it were in the U.S., you wouldn’t have public officials who would have the power to tell a hospital to do this or do that."....."

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

A Most Dangerous Precedent - A Most Dangerous President

So has Obama finally commited an impeachable offence?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/02/23/obama-administration-drops-defense-anti-gay-marriage-law/

The President is sworn to defend the Constitution, and with it the laws of the land. It does not matter if he likes or dislikes the law. If so then what about our border if he dislikes it? And what of other laws? Read and see the unraveling of America. Now President Obama has ordered the Justice Department not to defend the laws of the land. This is nothing less than treason.

Obama Administration Drops Defense of Anti-Gay Marriage Law

The Obama administration announced Wednesday that it will no longer defend the federal law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
The decision marks a significant about-face for the Obama Justice Department, which until now had defended the law in court despite President Obama's misgivings with the policy. The administration's attorneys as recently as last month had filed a court motion in support of the Defense of Marriage Act, which effectively bans recognition of same-sex marriage.
But after two new lawsuits were filed in New York and Connecticut, Obama ordered Attorney General Eric Holder not to defend the statute.
"I fully concur with the president's determination," Holder said in a statement, declaring the provision to be "unconstitutional."
Holder said members of Congress may step up to defend the statute, but the Justice Department "will cease defense."
He noted that the congressional debate during passage of the Defense of Marriage Act "contains numerous expressions reflecting moral disapproval of gays and lesbians and their intimate and family relationships -- precisely the kind of stereotype-based thinking and animus the (Constitution's) Equal Protection Clause is designed to guard against."
Holder wrote to House Speaker John Boehner that Obama concluded the law fails to meet a rigorous standard under which courts view with suspicion any laws targeting minority groups who have suffered a history of discrimination.
Boehner's office was taken aback by the move, suggesting it was a bit off-topic considering the high-profile battle lawmakers are waging on Capitol Hill over federal spending.
"While Americans want Washington to focus on creating jobs and cutting spending, the president will have to explain why he thinks now is the appropriate time to stir up a controversial issue that sharply divides the nation," Boehner spokesman Michael Steel told Fox News.
Maggie Gallagher, chairwoman of the National Organization for Marriage, said that if somebody from the House steps in to defend the law, it could actually be "good news" for Defense of Marriage Act supporters.
"This fight is not over yet. It's really just begun," she told Fox News.
Gay-rights groups applauded the administration. The Human Rights Campaign called the decision a "monumental" move against a law that "unfairly discriminates against Americans."
"Congressional leaders must not waste another taxpayer dollar defending this patently unconstitutional law," Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese said in a statement.
"The Obama administration's decision is a victory for civil rights, fairness, and equality for the LGBT community and all Americans," House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said.
The administration previously has defended laws with which the president disagrees, notably the "don't ask, don't tell" provision banning gays from serving openly in the military -- though that law was later repealed. Holder acknowledged this in his statement, but said there are exceptions.
"The department has a longstanding practice of defending the constitutionality of duly-enacted statutes if reasonable arguments can be made in their defense. At the same time, the department in the past has declined to defend statutes despite the availability of professionally responsible arguments, in part because -- as here -- the department does not consider every such argument to be a 'reasonable' one," Holder said. "Moreover, the department has declined to defend a statute in cases, like this one, where the president has concluded that the statute is unconstitutional."
Holder said the "legal landscape" has changed in the 15 years since the law was passed, citing the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" and lower-court rulings against the law.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney explained that the U.S. government will remain a party to Defense of Marriage Act cases so they can proceed in court. Though the administration says the key provision in the law is not constitutional, Carney said the administration will help others who want to defend it.
Obama, who supports the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, has said his views are "evolving" on same-sex marriage. Currently, he is only on record in support of civil unions.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Vitriolic? Socialist?

I guess the left did not get the note from President Obama about hate speech. Please excuse the vulgarity as I do not approve of it, but it paints just what the left is like.

Or how about the liberal teacher's true passion for socialism. If these are our teachers then we need to get rid of them and start with a clean slate.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Unions React to Taking Less From The Teat

Below is some contact info from Gayle Mahon. It would seem that, as I said many years ago, that those on entitlements would rebel if their entitlements were touched. Now the Unions feel that they should live better than those who pay them. They feel that they deserve more than the average Americans. They are insulted to have to pay what most of us have to pay. After all, isn't that why they sold their souls to the DNC? Wasn't the DNC as well as Obama supposed to protect them from reality? Well the chickens have come home to roost and the teat has run dry. Now they say they do not care about their state or their country. What matters is them. Added to that, Obama now feels that he must bash the states for daring to attempt to be fiscally responsible. It seems that Obama would be better served fixing his Federal mess rather than butt into the business of the states. Can you imagine the bloodshed in the streets if we ever take people off the welfare and food stamp teats? Its just a matter of time folks. Things are going to get really ugly.

Click on the link below to read an article from "The Hill" regarding Wisconsin's Governor Scott Walker and his fight with the unions.  I have e-mailed him and called his office to show support for what he is doing.    Contact information is as follows: 


Email
Mail
Office of Governor Scott Walker
115 East Capitol
Madison WI 53702

Phone
(608) 266-1212

All eyes of the nation are on Wisconsin.  The governor must stand strong and not compromise as to compromise would embolden unions in other states.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/145033-wisconsin-gov-gop-emboldened-by-protests-

Monday, February 14, 2011

B.H. Obama: Shameless Imperialist

B.H. Obama: Shameless Imperialist
By James Lewis

American Thinker Article Link

We’ve just watched Obama commit an act of imperialistic aggression against a peaceful sovereign state. Mubarak’s Egypt threatened no one. It was the great pillar of stability in the Middle East for thirty years. Its government was far more civilized than Iran, China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and fifty other corrupt and tyrannical members of the United Nations.
Obama’s whole spiel to the Left has been that he is an anti-colonial socialist; that’s why he wrote Dreams from My Father. Obama Sr. was a big anti-colonialist. Obama has claimed (at various times) to be the new Nelson Mandela, as well as the new Abe Lincoln, and most recently, the new Ronald Reagan.
But Reagan worked to liberate the oppressed peoples of Eastern Europe from Soviet tyranny. Barack Obama has now pushed, and pushed, and pushed to overthrow the government of a sovereign Muslim nation, the only Arab power to ever sign a peace treaty with Israel.
According to the lickspittles of the New York Times, this must be a great victory for democracy. They have failed to explain why that must be; instead, they’ve been chasing headlines, along with the other idiot media.  But there hasn’t even been an election in Egypt. Obama didn’t demand an election, and when Mubarak promised free and fair elections he was contemptuously turned down -- not by the people of Egypt, but by Washington, D.C.
The Tahrir Square mob was coordinated by a 30 year old Arabic-speaking Google executive. The Mu-Bros will now get a big vote -- like Hitler and the Turkish Muslim Brothers -- because Egyptians have been taught to believe all of the Mu-Bros fondest fascist beliefs. Egypt’s Muslim Brothers have already called for war with Israel.
Egypt is now a carbon copy of the way in Turkey, Gaza and Iran were taken over by the Muslim totalitarians. Turkey had excellent relations with Israel and Europe before the Brotherhood took over. Today it is an Islamofascist ally of Iran against the civilized world.
When Communists like Lenin committed aggression they re-defined the word “imperialism.” According to Lenin, Marxist tyrannies could never be imperialistic, no matter how many Ukrainians, Czechs, and Poles they murdered. That is why the Soviet Empire was never allowed to be called what it was: An Empire. Its abject colonial subjects in Eastern Europe are still afraid today of another Russian imperial assault.
Communists can’t be imperialistic, no matter how much they act like Nazi Germany. That is how the Communists conquered China, Cambodia, South Vietnam, and all the rest with no criticism in the West. You see, Communist imperialism was good imperialism.
Enter Obama. What Obama just did was encourage a twittered revolt against Mubarak, and then publicly, brutally, in the most humiliating way, order him to resign. Joe Stalin would have been proud. So would Mao Zedong. This is what the Soviets tried to do all around the world.
Obama has now turned the United States into a Leftist Imperialist power.
What’s his purpose? It can only be one. Obama believes the nonsense that all the problems of the Middle East would be solved if only Israel compromises enough with its deadliest enemies. Obama does not care about the fascist regime in Iran. When peaceful protesters were thronging the streets of Tehran last year he did nothing. It’s not a popular government that he cares about.
Rather, Obama and the radical Left are forging another Communist-Fascist alliance, exactly like the Hitler-Stalin Pact of 1938, which split up Poland and started World War Two. The new Red-Black alliance links the Radical Left with the Muslim radicals who attacked us on 9/11.
While the media are covering up this reality, we can see it all over the place: In the Ground Zero mosque, in the insane Congressional testimony by our DNI Clapper, that the Mu-Bros are “secular,” and in any number of other media-supported lies that serve only Muslim fascists and hard Leftists around the world.
In politics the question is always “Cui Bono?” -- Whom does it serve? And when you look at Obama’s brutal imperialistic push to get rid of Mubarak over the last several weeks, you know exactly whom it serves.
It serves radical Islam, because the Muslim Brothers now have a clear path to power in Egypt. They already control Turkey, Gaza, and soon, the West Bank of the Jordan River. Jordan has played a moderating role in the Middle East for generations; it is now threatened by a radical Muslim revolt.
This is Obama’s route to imperial power. It is consistent with all his actions in the last two years, and particularly with today’s public humiliation of the strongest Arab power in the world.
Obama’s ego is Napoleonic. He needs to expand his power without limits. That’s the nature of malignant narcissism.
Civilized and democratic peoples suffer when Napoleonic characters take power. We can’t see the end game yet. This might or might not end in a major war or worse. But we have a riverboat gambler running the ship of state, and he loves to play with the power of “audacity.”
That was Napoleon’s motto: “L’audace, l’audace, toujours l’laudace.” Which worked fine for Napoleon’s field marshals, but not so well for all the defeated peoples of Europe and the Middle East. And in the end, Napoleon’s audacity died in the snows of the Russian winter.
With the radical Obama administration, the United States has now embarked on a perilous course. Instead of keeping the dominoes from toppling, Obama is malignantly pushing them into the arms of Islamic radicals. That kind of gamble has never before worked to the betterment of humanity.
On the contrary: It has always led to disaster before.
Whether Obama the magic trickster can now pull it off in the nuclearizing Middle East is very doubtful, and therefore very dangerous.

Friday, January 28, 2011

My View of the SOTU by Gayle Mahon

After having a day to digest the SOTU, I am surprised that more have not commented on the slap in our face by Obama referencing all of his glowing statements about China. It is unreal to me, that we have a President who, instead of talking about America's greatness, worships at the feet of a brutal, Communist dictatorship. I wonder what the children trapped in child labor in China or the people in Chinese prisons, whose only crime is to want freedom, would say if they could have heard Obama's speech? His praise of the Chinese educational system is unbelievable!! Children are forced to go to government controlled schools that brain wash them for 12 hours a day. Oh, wait a minute, part of that describes some of OUR public schools in this country. Women are forced to have abortions if they have more than one child - some are forceably sterilized. The comment he made, longingly, about if the Chinese government doesn't want a story in the media, it's not in the media, was a fruedian slip on his goal for our country. WAKE UP AMERICA! You can believe the Communist Chinese are laughing very loudly behind our backs. A great summary of the SOTU posted in the "IUSB Vision Weblog" follows:

Translation of Obama’s SOTU ‘Five’ Pillars Posted by iusbvisionon January 26, 2011 As a follow up to our live bloggingto President Obama’s State of the Union address a translation of the five pillars seems in order.
“Making sure we are competitive and creating jobs” sounds great, but we have heard that before. We have also heard it after every bill that turns out to be a power grab that fails the economy he says “OK now we will focus on jobs.”
So far he is doing a great job of shutting down energy production and sending “green jobs” funds to China.
Innovation:
Forbid drilling, closing more coal mines, forbid nuclear plant licencing, no new natural gas, more solar panel factories chased out of the country, more low cost loans to foreign countries so THEY can drill more, more Mexican, Cuban and Chinese oil wells just off our shores, more EPA caps on our refineries. More expensive energy.
The solution? The joke that is now called the Chevy Volt. Poisonous
and expensive twisty light bulbs, expensive solar and wind power that
can’t do the industrial heavy lifting we need.
Education:
More government programs and bureaucrats, more tax dollars thrown at teachers unions. More sabotaging of voucher programs. More outrageous reporting requirements. More failed schools. More students left behind.
Information:
More online databases of your information such as medical records. Privacy (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)?
Infrastructure:
Make work programs for unions in cities, like the high speed raid Obama mentioned. Corruption: Stimulus Funds Spent in Democrat Districts… Deficit Reduction:
Keep repeating the lie that ObamaCare lowers the deficit. Raise taxes.
Government Reform:
Rule by executive order. Bypass Congress and put the czar’s to work. Abuse the regulatory and permit process for social engineering