EGYPT WIPES ISRAEL OFF THIER MAPS?

EGYPT WIPES ISRAEL OFF THIER MAPS? - Gayle Mahon

Believe me, the subject discussed in the article linked below is no accident. We are only just beginning to see the consequences of Obama bullying Mubarak out of power.  Israel will not be the only country to feel these consequences, America will also.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/egypt-air-wipes-israel-off-the-map/

B.H. Obama: Shameless Imperialist

B.H. Obama: Shameless Imperialist
By James Lewis

American Thinker Article Link

We’ve just watched Obama commit an act of imperialistic aggression against a peaceful sovereign state. Mubarak’s Egypt threatened no one. It was the great pillar of stability in the Middle East for thirty years. Its government was far more civilized than Iran, China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and fifty other corrupt and tyrannical members of the United Nations.
Obama’s whole spiel to the Left has been that he is an anti-colonial socialist; that’s why he wrote Dreams from My Father. Obama Sr. was a big anti-colonialist. Obama has claimed (at various times) to be the new Nelson Mandela, as well as the new Abe Lincoln, and most recently, the new Ronald Reagan.
But Reagan worked to liberate the oppressed peoples of Eastern Europe from Soviet tyranny. Barack Obama has now pushed, and pushed, and pushed to overthrow the government of a sovereign Muslim nation, the only Arab power to ever sign a peace treaty with Israel.
According to the lickspittles of the New York Times, this must be a great victory for democracy. They have failed to explain why that must be; instead, they’ve been chasing headlines, along with the other idiot media.  But there hasn’t even been an election in Egypt. Obama didn’t demand an election, and when Mubarak promised free and fair elections he was contemptuously turned down -- not by the people of Egypt, but by Washington, D.C.
The Tahrir Square mob was coordinated by a 30 year old Arabic-speaking Google executive. The Mu-Bros will now get a big vote -- like Hitler and the Turkish Muslim Brothers -- because Egyptians have been taught to believe all of the Mu-Bros fondest fascist beliefs. Egypt’s Muslim Brothers have already called for war with Israel.
Egypt is now a carbon copy of the way in Turkey, Gaza and Iran were taken over by the Muslim totalitarians. Turkey had excellent relations with Israel and Europe before the Brotherhood took over. Today it is an Islamofascist ally of Iran against the civilized world.
When Communists like Lenin committed aggression they re-defined the word “imperialism.” According to Lenin, Marxist tyrannies could never be imperialistic, no matter how many Ukrainians, Czechs, and Poles they murdered. That is why the Soviet Empire was never allowed to be called what it was: An Empire. Its abject colonial subjects in Eastern Europe are still afraid today of another Russian imperial assault.
Communists can’t be imperialistic, no matter how much they act like Nazi Germany. That is how the Communists conquered China, Cambodia, South Vietnam, and all the rest with no criticism in the West. You see, Communist imperialism was good imperialism.
Enter Obama. What Obama just did was encourage a twittered revolt against Mubarak, and then publicly, brutally, in the most humiliating way, order him to resign. Joe Stalin would have been proud. So would Mao Zedong. This is what the Soviets tried to do all around the world.
Obama has now turned the United States into a Leftist Imperialist power.
What’s his purpose? It can only be one. Obama believes the nonsense that all the problems of the Middle East would be solved if only Israel compromises enough with its deadliest enemies. Obama does not care about the fascist regime in Iran. When peaceful protesters were thronging the streets of Tehran last year he did nothing. It’s not a popular government that he cares about.
Rather, Obama and the radical Left are forging another Communist-Fascist alliance, exactly like the Hitler-Stalin Pact of 1938, which split up Poland and started World War Two. The new Red-Black alliance links the Radical Left with the Muslim radicals who attacked us on 9/11.
While the media are covering up this reality, we can see it all over the place: In the Ground Zero mosque, in the insane Congressional testimony by our DNI Clapper, that the Mu-Bros are “secular,” and in any number of other media-supported lies that serve only Muslim fascists and hard Leftists around the world.
In politics the question is always “Cui Bono?” -- Whom does it serve? And when you look at Obama’s brutal imperialistic push to get rid of Mubarak over the last several weeks, you know exactly whom it serves.
It serves radical Islam, because the Muslim Brothers now have a clear path to power in Egypt. They already control Turkey, Gaza, and soon, the West Bank of the Jordan River. Jordan has played a moderating role in the Middle East for generations; it is now threatened by a radical Muslim revolt.
This is Obama’s route to imperial power. It is consistent with all his actions in the last two years, and particularly with today’s public humiliation of the strongest Arab power in the world.
Obama’s ego is Napoleonic. He needs to expand his power without limits. That’s the nature of malignant narcissism.
Civilized and democratic peoples suffer when Napoleonic characters take power. We can’t see the end game yet. This might or might not end in a major war or worse. But we have a riverboat gambler running the ship of state, and he loves to play with the power of “audacity.”
That was Napoleon’s motto: “L’audace, l’audace, toujours l’laudace.” Which worked fine for Napoleon’s field marshals, but not so well for all the defeated peoples of Europe and the Middle East. And in the end, Napoleon’s audacity died in the snows of the Russian winter.
With the radical Obama administration, the United States has now embarked on a perilous course. Instead of keeping the dominoes from toppling, Obama is malignantly pushing them into the arms of Islamic radicals. That kind of gamble has never before worked to the betterment of humanity.
On the contrary: It has always led to disaster before.
Whether Obama the magic trickster can now pull it off in the nuclearizing Middle East is very doubtful, and therefore very dangerous.

MSM Darlings? May God help us from us

When one examines the latest happenings in Egypt, one must come to the logical conclusion that what awaits Egypt and the world, is far worse than what it had. Was Hosni Mubarak a saint? By no means! But was trading a demon for Satan any better? Well, the Main Stream Media thinks so. In our highly uneducated world, many have decided to allow the Media to do our thinking. This is no new phenomena, as we will see later in this post, but it does seem that it is growing. In a recent visit to the ER, while sitting in the waiting area, I glanced up at the television. What I saw was no surprise as it was a popular talk show. It was what I refer to as tabloid TV.  But what did strike me for the first time is that the term tabloid TV is very revealing of our society. What really is sad, is that what we used to laugh at as ridiculous in the grocery checkout lines, has now become the guide to life for some very weak minded people. People like Oprah helped elect one of, if not the worst, president in history. The Dr. Phil’s will tell people how to think, and the Judge Judy’s will discern legal issues.

Well much the same is the MSM. As America became addicted to entertainment, so entertainment took a greater step into the lives of people. We witnessed this in the violent revolt in Egypt, which the MSM deemed “non-violent”. Adding insult to injury, the biased reporters were attacked, and that equates to media blasphemy, as they feel they are far superior to anyone and everyone. After all, they feel they know what is best for the world. So, with their assistance, world opinion swayed against Mubarak, and he was forced from power. Yet he has since uttered some very profound words.

“Hosni Mubarak had harsh words for the United States and what he described as its misguided quest for democracy in the Middle East in a telephone call with an Israeli lawmaker a day before he quit as Egypt's president.”

"He had very tough things to say about the United States," said Ben-Eliezer, a member of the Labor Party who has held talks with Mubarak on numerous occasions while serving in various Israeli coalition governments.

"He gave me a lesson in democracy and said: 'We see the democracy the United States spearheaded in Iran and with Hamas, in Gaza, and that's the fate of the Middle East,'" Ben-Eliezer said.

"'They may be talking about democracy but they don't know what they're talking about and the result will be extremism and radical Islam,'" he quoted Mubarak as saying.

Ben-Eliezer said Mubarak expanded in the telephone call on "what he expects will happen in the Middle East after his fall".

"He contended the snowball (of civil unrest) won't stop in Egypt and it wouldn't skip any Arab country in the Middle East and in the Gulf.

"He said 'I won't be surprised if in the future you see more extremism and radical Islam and more disturbances -- dramatic changes and upheavals," Ben-Eliezer added.

So then why is the media basically ignoring the truth? Well, if their history is any indication, they tend to lean toward leftist and anti-American governments. Let us go over some history of the MSM’s love affair with radicals, as well as those who replaced those they helped to displace.

Example #1
In the late 1950s Herbert Matthews of the New York Times as well as his obliging comrades felt that Cuba had an evil dictator in Fulgencio Batista (it is ironic that the same media will refer to his replacement Castro as president rather than dictator). They fed the world through stories about how bad Cuba was under Batista. The same story they spread today in order to cover up the disaster that replaced Batista. Fulgencio Batista was no sweetheart by any means, but due to his media honored replacement the world came closer to Nuclear War than it ever had. Much of Latin America was destabilized, and Cuba has suffered for over 50 years under a repressive Communist government.

Example #2
In the late 1970’s the MSM decided that Iran too had an evil dictator. As in Cuba the people supposedly had spoken and there was true freedom to be had. The Shah of Iran was deposed and sent into exile much like Batista, and we are now once again close to a Nuclear War, as well as a destabilization of the Middle East. Iran is now one of the major sponsors of terrorism.

Example #3
This is much closer to recent history, the MSM’s love affair with Hamas, which goes hand in hand with the MSM’s hatred of Israel. The Palestinians were portrayed as the helpless victims when in reality they strove for the total annhialation of Israel. Hamas is now, as they always have been, a terrorist group which also destabilizes the Middle-East

Example #4
In the late 1970’s again the MSM fell in love with the FSLN Communist Guerillas. Once again they demonized a flawed leader to the extent of embracing something much worse. They went after Somoza with both barrels and helped to create yet another presumed utopia in which they gladly made a bed that others must lie in.

Based on the selected examples, of which we could bring up many more, there is an obvious pattern. The MSM customarily embraces what they feel is good for others, but which they need not have to live with. They boast of the superior conditions in the countries they helped to destabilize, yet none of them would want to live in those countries, as they would have no freedoms. The MSM loves Castro’s Cuba, yet would be in prison for saying what they say. The MSM loved the FSLN, yet would have been executed if they were reporters in the FSLN’s Nicaragua. The MSM loved the Iranian rebels of the 1970s, yet would be beheaded in today’s Iran. The MSM loved Hamas, yet they would be executed by Hamas.

So now based on past history we see prophecy come to pass. George Santayana once said that “those who refuse to remember the past are condemned to relive it”.

Fulgencio Batista, upon his departure from Cuba, basically said to be careful what you wish for, as you just might get it. He foresaw that what would replace him, would be far worse than what they had. His prophecy came to pass. Now Mubarak has prophesied the same. The difference being is that while Batista’s prophecy indirectly affected the rest of the world, Mubarak’s will affect the world more than many reading this can ever imagine. They say that a violation of freedom of speech is when someone yells fire in a crowded theater. I would almost say that the MSM is doing the same when they irresponsibly create news regarding other countries. But who is to blame? Is it the MSM, or those that foolishly hang on their every word? I would say the latter. May God help us from us.

The proverbial fox guarding the henhouse

Click the Link

"...The demonstrations Sunday seemed generally peaceful. Among those taking part were members of Egypt's Christian minority, who held a Mass in Tahrir Square paying tribute to those killed during clashes. Some Muslim protesters vowed to form a ring around the Christians and protect them during the service. Egypt's population is 10% Christian, a minority mostly made up of Coptic Christians. ..'''

Are people really this stupid? So the Muslims in their desire for good PR say they want to protect the Christians? Just one basic question that the media seemed to forget to ask. Who are they protecting the Christians from? Its only the Muslims who want to kill Christians. So the Muslims will protects the Christians from the Muslims for a show mass and the media gobbles it up. Once again the ignorance of the sheep shows up in the ridiculous propaganda pieces put out for consumption.
I wonder what the media would have reported if the WWII Nazis had offered a bagel giveaway in a concentration camp? Let me guess.....
"Generous Nazis believe that every Jew deserves a bagel"
Never mind that they got to hold onto the bagels on their way to the gas chambers.

Let me get this straight….

President Obama feels that the Egyptian protests in the streets of Egypt justify a change in government, and thus the government should heed to the voice of the people? That the government should not silence the voice of the mobs, and thus mob rule should reign?
I wonder how President Obama would feel if the shoe were on the other foot? Let’s say perhaps if we went to the streets to oppose the socialization of America? If we went to the streets to overturn the Obamacare socialized medicine scheme?
President Obama also has publicly renounced Egypt’s alleged violence against its citizens when the total death toll from the protests at last check was 38. Incidentally they were responding to violence. Did you hear President Obama tell that to the Chinese? Or perhaps did you hear President Obama tell that to Cuba? No, an odd coincidence is that those who are working to overturn the Egyptian government are Muslims. Also, I do not hear the outcry from the left that we are not to be the policeman of the world, nor that we should not try to control other sovereign nations, yet that is what President Obama is doing.
We are now seeing the fruits of the famed “apology” tour of President Obama. Iran now has nuclear capability which threatens Mid-East peace, and primarily the security of the people of Israel. Egypt, if indeed becomes Muslim governed through the Islamic Brotherhood, would then no longer be the safety check against rogue Islamic extremist countries.
But does any of that affect us?
Here is the long answer to a very short question. First off let me state that I am only giving political and national security repercussions, as morally it is quite obvious that we cannot allow the planned annihilation of Israel or any other people that do not succumb to Islam. Without Israel there is no safety check in the Middle East. If Egypt is lost to Muslim extremists, then there is a little something called the Suez Canal that may affect things. Not only do prices go up at the pump, and any item you buy that contains petroleum increase, but a major worldwide economic collapse would eventually occur. Not to mention that our own military relies on fuel. If that were not enough, with a worldwide economic collapse would come uprisings due to that collapse, which would topple governments, as well as order across the globe. The result would be total anarchy.
And what of the defense of our own country? For one, we would see uprisings as well. Enemies of America would be further emboldened, as we see Muslim extremists already crossing through the sieve known as our Southern Border. Sadly some have already forgotten 9/11 as well as the multiple past attacks against America. President Obama is undoing decades of work that was done to keep a volatile region from infecting the rest of the globe through his actions as well as inactions. It would seem that the “yes we can” slogan was adopted by the Muslim extremists due to President Obama’s leadership or lack of. More of the Hope and Change that we all feared is coming true. May God help America from its leader. Perhaps we should take to the streets before it is too late. After all, President Obama says he supports that. Or maybe he just believes that this applies to the other guys.